Conservative Index Add
pagetitle

Monday, December 18th, 2017Last Update: Tuesday, August 1st, 2017 01:57:38 PM

Federal Government Suspends Asset Forfeiture Program

By: Constitution Staff

Federal Government Suspends Asset Forfeiture Program

The Department of Justice has criticized some of the Oklahoma Highway Patrol's spending of those funds.

State Senator Kyle Loveless (R-Oklahoma City) who is working to improve Oklahoma's forfeiture laws said the recent decision by the U.S. Department of Justice to suspend the Federal Equitable Sharing Program was a step in the right direction, but reform of state statutes is still needed. The federal program allowed state and local law enforcement agencies to partner with federal law enforcement in prosecuting civil asset forfeitures under federal law instead of using state law. The program allowed local agencies to receive up to 80 percent of the proceeds from those forfeitures.

"I am working to reform Oklahoma's state laws regarding forfeiture to make them align with the tenets of our constitution and proper due process," said Sen. Loveless. "The Federal Equitable Sharing Program is one piece of a much larger issue with forfeiture overall. I am pleased that this program has been suspended; however, we must reform our state laws as we have seen the whims of Washington DC change overnight."

According to data from Oklahoma Watch, more than 100 Oklahoma law enforcement agencies received $47.5 million in equitable sharing funds in the last decade, with the Oklahoma Highway Patrol receiving the vast majority of the money. The Department of Justice has criticized some of the Oklahoma Highway Patrol's spending of those funds.

Unlike criminal asset forfeiture, civil asset forfeiture does not require a conviction. In fact, the person who has their property taken under civil asset forfeiture might not even be charged with a crime. Over a five-year period, law enforcement officials in 12 Oklahoma Counties seized more than $6 million in cash, almost $4 million of which was taken without any criminal charge. Records indicate that of the $6.1 million dollars taken, only $2.1 million was seized from people who were actually charged with a crime, meaning more than 65 percent of the cash seized was taken without any criminal charges being filed.

"Civil forfeiture is rife with abuse. The more attention that is brought to the practice, the more stories that have come to light. There are several parts to my reform package but the most critical is removing the direct profit agencies receive from forfeitures," Loveless said.

Essentially, property, and usually cash, can be seized during a traffic stop based solely on a mere suspicion that it was involved in or profit from criminal activity. Cash isn't the only property subject to seizure. Oklahoma law also allows for nearly any item that can be assumed guilty of involvement in a crime including cars, land, cell phones and even guns.

In the last legislative session, Loveless introduced Senate Bill 838, the Personal Asset Protection Act. This legislation would fundamentally reform asset forfeiture to realign the process with its intended goal of stopping criminal activity-all while protecting property rights and individual liberty. He has reintroduced the legislation as a package which includes three stand-alone bills and one omnibus reform bill.

There are four main objectives of Loveless's legislation. First, it would guarantee that the owner and their property are innocent until proven guilty. This foundational principle of our justice system is ignored by Oklahoma's current forfeiture laws. Secondly, the bill will require a conviction before property can be forfeited. The new package provides five exemptions to this requirement including the death of the owner or the owner was given immunity as part of a plea agreement. Third, it would raise the burden of proof to a higher threshold. The current law only requires a preponderance of the evidence, one of the lowest levels. The legislation would raise that bar to clear and convincing; requiring the government to have more evidence than suspicion. Finally, it would remove the financial incentive law enforcement currently has to use forfeiture. Currently, proceeds from forfeiture can be used by the seizing agency. Allowing an agency to keep what it takes breeds a culture of want and need instead of a culture of enforcement.

"As more and more Oklahomans hear about the experiences of law-abiding citizens who've had their property seized, they recognize current forfeiture practices as unconstitutional and un-American. This is an unjust system that allows innocent people's property to be taken even though they were not charged or convicted of any crime. I am looking forward to working with members of law enforcement and my legislative colleagues to get a package of reforms to the governor's desk this coming legislative session," said Loveless.

Lee McGrath of the Legislative Council for the Institute for Justice commented on the federal action: "State legislators from Florida to Ohio to California should take notice of law enforcement's reaction to the DOJ's announcement. Many police, sheriffs and prosecutors want to circumvent state laws because outsourcing forfeiture litigation to the federal government is lucrative. State lawmakers should enact an anti-circumvention provision that respects federalism and refocuses law enforcement's attention on stopping crime by allowing only seizures greater than $50,000 to be forfeited under federal law."

Other Stories From Winter 2016 Issue

School Choice Reduces Racial Segregation

Brandon Dutcher
A common myth about private-school choice programs is that they are examples of white flight...

Red to the Roots

Richard Engle
Would it surprise you to hear that only 45% of partisan elected officials in Oklahoma are...

Its Biblical, NOT Political

Dr. James Taylor
Should Pastors Be Political? Words I have heard many times. Oddly enough, are; I dont think a...

Making Sense of 3% in a 1% World

Andrew K. Boyle
In a normal world, the news of Oklahomas declining state revenue would be easy to process.E...

The Crown: Too Heavy for Human Heads

John Michener
Why are conservatives across the land so upset that Planned Parenthood is selling baby parts? Did...

The National Popular Vote Fallacy

Paul R. Hollrah
In 2000, out of a total popular vote of 101,455,900, the Gore-Lieberman ticket won a narrow majority...

Is There a Gay Agenda?

David Deming
Is there a gay agenda? Of course there is. In 1975, I took a college course in psychology. The...

My Case for Budget Reform

Rep. Jason Murphey
As I considered an article regarding the need for a reform of the state budget process, I recalled a...

The Growing Federal Education Bureaucracy

Linda Murphy
Federal government bureaucrats now have new ways to be involved in every aspect of the life of a...

Article V Convention: Gambling With our Constitution

Steve Byas
We have heard tragic stories of some poor guy who blows his own brains out, losing a game of ...

THE FEDERAL PAGE (Winter 2016)

Theodore King
A Housekeeping Note on LanguageLanguage is important. In this campaign we hear candidates, pundi...

Letters to the Editor for Winter 2016

Constitution Staff
Begin All overWhile it would really be great to be able to wipe the slate clean and be...

Tidbits for Winter 2016

Constitution Staff
Oklahoma Voter Registration StatisticsOklahomas official voter registration statistics are c...

Past Judicial Reform Efforts Have Mostly Failed

Constitution Staff
Efforts to enact judicial reform are not new to the Oklahoma Legislature. In fact, a number of...

Oklahoma Judicial Reform Legislation Proposed

Constitution Staff
The next Oklahoma Legislature will consider a number of bills concerning Oklahomas judiciary and...

In The News

Constitution Staff

Special Elections for Legislative Seats
Special Elections to fill vacancies in the Oklahoma Legislature are progressing, with three of seven...

Stan Ward

Tax Profligation Challenged
SQ 640 was perhaps the most prolific grass roots amendment ever to the Oklahoma Constitution....

Rep. Jason Murphey

The New Ideology of the Legislature
I will detail here the chain of events that transformed what I initially believed could be the best...

Steve Byas

Our Michelle Obama Legislature
When we started the Oklahoma Conservative Index in 1979, we had about 20 Republicans in the state...

Constitution Staff

Oklahoma Legislators Rated
This issue of the Oklahoma Constitution presents the 39th annual Oklahoma Conservative Index, rating...

Constitution Columnists

Linda Murphy

Oklahomas Education Standards for American History
Oklahomas standards and testing for American History are being rewritten as educators learned at the...

Theodore King

THE FEDERAL PAGE for Summer 2017
Congressman Markwayne MullinDid, Indeed, Not Tell the TruthIn the spring issue I wrote that Second...

Richard Engle

Republicans for Governor
Its early, but any serious candidate has, by now at least, made public their intent to run. The...

© 2001 - 2009 The Oklahoma Constitution, all rights reserved.
Contact the Oklahoma Constitution by calling 405-366-1125 or emailing okconsti@aol.com
Content Management System (CMS) provided by WebTeks CMS.