Conservative Index Add
pagetitle

Sunday, October 22nd, 2017Last Update: Tuesday, August 1st, 2017 01:57:38 PM

Solving School Funding and Overcrowding Problems

By: Charlie Meadows

Solving School Funding and Overcrowding Problems

It appears legislation during this year’s session to create Education Savings Accounts (ESAs) was the trigger that set in motion a huge effort to put more educators in the state legislature.

Could the educators be responsible for funding and overcrowding problems in the government schools? The short answer is YES, they are PARTLY to blame. In my opinion, it really is time for the people of Oklahoma to understand far more about our education problems than they will ever learn by watching a Toby Kieth commercial or listening to David Boren, Sean Hime of the State School Boards Association, or the many other apologists for the government schools.

Unrest has been brewing in recent years, caused by the teachers not receiving an across the board increase in the minimum amounts that teachers must be paid. In recent years we have seen thousands of teachers abandon their classrooms to “rally” at the Capitol, demanding more money for education. We are also fed a steady diet in the local media of the “dire funding problems” in education.

It appears legislation during this year’s session to create Education Savings Accounts (ESAs) was the trigger that set in motion a huge effort to put more educators in the state legislature. It has been estimated that up to 80 candidates are a part of a loosely organized group of education candidates running for office. Following the primary elections, there are about 50 of these candidates left in the process for the November 8th election, most of the other 30 have already been defeated.

In an attempt to get the legislation passed, House author Jason Nelson, (R-Oklahoma City) altered his ESA bill numerous times to try and solve the education industry’s opposition to the legislation. The final version of the bill would have done three things. First it would have increased per-pupil funding, second, it would have reduced overcrowding, and third, it would have empowered parents who believe their children could receive a better education in a private school to do so with some education funding help.

Here is how the legislation would have worked. Let’s say parents (A) pretty much live on the edge of poverty, but believe their child would do better in a private school. That is if they could just somehow afford the tuition. Let us say that the state aid going to their local government school to educate their child was $7,000 per year. Under the ESA plan, if they “removed” the child from their local school they would have 80% of the state aid ($5,600) available for tuition to a private school. Private school tuition ranges from about $3,500 per year on the low end to $15,000 per year on the high end.

However, the government school would still receive 20% ($1,400) of the funding for the child that was no longer in the school. With the child no longer in the school, that would cut down on overcrowding, and the $1,400 could be spread around for the benefit of the other children still in the school. That would increase the per pupil funding. Then of course, parents (A) would now be able to afford a better education for their child. This would be a win, win, win situation, but guess who opposed the measure? None other than the educators and their many lackeys that currently hold office at the legislature.

Now, if we were to consider parents (B) at the upper end of the income scale, the situation would be the same, with the only difference being in the numbers. Parents (B) would only receive 50% ($3,500) of the state aid and the school would have received the other $3,500. Again, it was the educators that opposed this legislation which is why I say they are partly to blame for overcrowding. They also need to put their big boy and girl panties on and own up to the fact that their opposition meant rejecting higher per pupil funding for the remaining children in their local government school.

Ultimately, there are many problems in our government schools that lead to an inferior education for our children. I have contended for a long time now, that the number one problem in education is a “monopoly” on school funding. Charter schools are a little improvement on that problem, but until we can pry away the death grip the educators have on their funding monopoly, I don’t care how much more money you pour into education, it will not improve. To eliminate the government education monopoly, we need fewer educators, spouses of educators, and rabid fans of the government schools in the legislature, not more of them.

Charlie Meadows is the founder and former president of the Oklahoma Conservative Political Action Committee (OCPAC).

About Charlie Meadows

Charlie Meadows is the founder and former president of the Oklahoma Conservative Political Action Committee (OCPAC).

Other Articles By Charlie Meadows

Dan Fisher for Governor: What in the world is he thinking?

After informing many folks about former Republican State Representative Dan Fisher, now pastor,...

Have Republican Lawmakers Been Suckered into the Agenda of the Education Industry?

Have Republican Lawmakers Been Suckered into the Agenda of the Education Industry?...

The Prudent Fix for Oklahomas Long Term Budget Problems!

Here we go again, another year of expected budget short falls, caused mainly by the downturn in...

Solving School Funding and Overcrowding Problems

Solving School Funding and Overcrowding Problems...

Governor Fallin "Worse than I Expected"

When Mary Fallin was running for governor in 2010, I made no bones about her not being a...

Sen. Loveless, New Pom Pom Leader for Indian Cultural Center

Freshman state Senator Kyle Loveless (R-Mustang) had a column in the Oklahoman explaining his flip...

Honest Change of Mind or Political Flip-flop?

HB 2130, a high profile bill by Oklahoma House Speaker Kris Steele and supported by Governor Mary...

Other Constitution Columnists

Linda Murphy

Oklahomas Education Standards for American History
Oklahomas standards and testing for American History are being rewritten as educators learned at the...

Theodore King

THE FEDERAL PAGE for Summer 2017
Congressman Markwayne MullinDid, Indeed, Not Tell the TruthIn the spring issue I wrote that Second...

Richard Engle

Republicans for Governor
Its early, but any serious candidate has, by now at least, made public their intent to run. The...

Brandon Dutcher

Bartlesville School Board Looks Out for Taxpayers
In June, the Bartlesville school board voted unanimously to outsource the schools janitorial...

Andrew K. Boyle

Drew Edmondson and the Coming Democratic SuperCell
Its the lazy days of summer. That time of the year when political noise tends to quiet a bit....

In The News

Constitution Staff

Special Elections for Legislative Seats
Special Elections to fill vacancies in the Oklahoma Legislature are progressing, with three of seven...

Stan Ward

Tax Profligation Challenged
SQ 640 was perhaps the most prolific grass roots amendment ever to the Oklahoma Constitution....

Rep. Jason Murphey

The New Ideology of the Legislature
I will detail here the chain of events that transformed what I initially believed could be the best...

Steve Byas

Our Michelle Obama Legislature
When we started the Oklahoma Conservative Index in 1979, we had about 20 Republicans in the state...

Constitution Staff

Oklahoma Legislators Rated
This issue of the Oklahoma Constitution presents the 39th annual Oklahoma Conservative Index, rating...

Constitution Columnists

Linda Murphy

Oklahomas Education Standards for American History
Oklahomas standards and testing for American History are being rewritten as educators learned at the...

Theodore King

THE FEDERAL PAGE for Summer 2017
Congressman Markwayne MullinDid, Indeed, Not Tell the TruthIn the spring issue I wrote that Second...

Richard Engle

Republicans for Governor
Its early, but any serious candidate has, by now at least, made public their intent to run. The...

© 2001 - 2009 The Oklahoma Constitution, all rights reserved.
Contact the Oklahoma Constitution by calling 405-366-1125 or emailing okconsti@aol.com
Content Management System (CMS) provided by WebTeks CMS.