Conservative Index Add
pagetitle

Saturday, February 17th, 2018Last Update: Sunday, February 4th, 2018 06:56:13 PM

The Need to Transform the Legislative Process

By: Rep. Jason Murphey

It is the time of year when legislators file legislation for the next session. Every so often I feel it important to write an article which describes the process by which a bill becomes law.

Only a small percentage of introduced bills are successfully passed into law. Many of those that are approved are requested and guided through the legislative process by either lobbyists or state agency officials. There are not many bills approved that are “grassroots-driven” (requested by constituents).

Each bill must have a House and Senate author. The representative must recruit a senator to sponsor his bill in the Senate. It is important to choose a senator based on his/her abilities and commitment to the principle of the bill.

The bill filed by the representative will be assigned to a House committee where the chairman decides whether to give the bill a hearing and, if so, the full committee is then required to vote on passage. Many bills die without receiving a hearing.

A bill passed by a committee must receive permission from the Majority Floor Leader in order to be considered by the full House. If he consents to providing a hearing on the floor of the House, the full House has to vote on passage.

Numerous bills fail to receive the clearance of the Majority Floor Leader for placement onto the floor calendar, and even if they are placed on the calendar, they still may not be heard simply because the deadline for hearing the bill kicks in before the bill can be heard by the full House. This concentration of power is a horrible flaw in the legislative process and one which should be eliminated.

Once the bill is approved by the House, it is sent to the Senate where the process is repeated, including a committee assignment, a vote in committee, and a vote on the floor of the Senate. Even when approving a House bill, the Senate may strike the title of the bill which will force it to go into the conference committee process, because no bill can become law without a title.

The bill then returns to the House where any Senate amendments must be considered by a vote of the House. If the author of the bill rejects the Senate amendments, the bill goes to a conference committee.

If either the Senate or the House leadership fails to assign conference committee members (conferees) to the bill prior to the deadline for assignments, the bill dies. If conferees are assigned, the bill has to receive the support of a majority of both House and Senate conference committee members. This means the author of the bill has to once again present the bill in the committee environment.

If the conference committee approves the bill, it needs approval once again through a vote of the entire House and Senate. If the bill is not scheduled by the Legislature’s late May deadline in either the House or Senate, it does not pass. This provides leadership with one final method of killing a bill if they choose to do so.

If both legislative chambers approve the bill, it is sent to the Governor for approval. If the Governor vetoes the bill, it has to go back to the House and the Senate for a possible override vote. In order to override the Governor’s veto, at least two-thirds of both House and Senate must vote for the override.

As the reader can see, winning approval for grassroots-backed legislation isn’t an easy task. Without the support mechanism of a professional special interest group or a government agency, legislative proposals face an uphill battle.

You will also take note that this is not a democratic process through which good ideas rise on their own merit; instead, it remains an archaic process of closed-door, behind-the-scenes, concentrated power that all too often kills good policy for the wrong reasons, while advancing the special interest proposals that are good for the special interests at the expense of the whole.

Until Oklahomans insist on a complete, transformative overhaul of the legislative process (likely through an initiative petition process to amend the Constitution), they will continue to receive the same results.

State Representative Jason Murphey (R-Guthrie) represents House District 31. He may be reached via e-mail at: Jason.Murphey@hd31.org

About Rep. Jason Murphey

State Representative Jason Murphey (R-Guthrie) represents House District 31. He is Chairman of the Government Modernization Committee. He may be reached via e-mail at: Jason.Murphey@hd31.org

Other Articles By Rep. Jason Murphey

The Need to Transform the Legislative Process

It is the time of year when legislators file legislation for the next session. Every so often I feel...

The New Ideology of the Legislature

I will detail here the chain of events that transformed what I initially believed could be the best...

Big Government Groundhog Day

State officials are continuing to consider an array of tax and fee increases. I instinctively know...

No to Gas Tax Increase

You may have recently seen news stories describing the impending introduction of a gas tax increase....

Giving Away Absolute Power For One Year

Many taxpayers believe the Legislature operates as described in American Government class. They...

Vote Walking

Each year, members of the Legislature cast votes impacting almost every aspect of life: from public...

Did the State Adopt Common Core Again?

I have received numerous emails regarding the states recent action to adopt new English and math...

Other Constitution Columnists

Richard Engle

Our Dirty Little (Not So) Secret
Did anyone actually think the Devil would go about with horns and a dark suit tempting people with...

John Michener

Conspiracy Can Aid or End Our Culture of Corruption
We all have that friend for whom everything is a conspiracy. Typically, this person will latch on to...

Rep. Jason Murphey

The Need to Transform the Legislative Process
It is the time of year when legislators file legislation for the next session. Every so often I feel...

Brandon Dutcher

The Higher Ed Defunding Thats Yet to Come?
Theres been much hand-wringing lately among some higher-education officials and journalists (to the...

Andrew K. Boyle

Step up Oklahoma is Awful Delightfully, Refreshingly Awful and Mr Madison says that is OK.
Honest men should be embarrassed by their systems government; we conservatives tend to forget this...

In The News

Constitution Staff

Efforts to Get Corporation Commission to Reopen Southwestern Bell Case Continue
On December 19, the Oklahoma Supreme Court ruled 8-1 against a group of former Southwestern Bell...

Constitution Staff

Federal Tax Cuts Could Result in Utility Rate Cuts
Federal Tax Cuts Could Result in Utility Rate Cuts for CustomersThe estimated annual tax savings for...

Constitution Staff

Special Elections for Legislative Seats
Special Elections to fill vacancies in the Oklahoma Legislature continue, with seven of nine...

Constitution Staff

Gross Receipts to the State Treasury Shows Growth
State Treasurer Ken Miller announced on January 5 that Gross Receipts to the state Treasury surged...

Constitution Staff

Step Up Oklahoma Calls for Tax Increases
In what can only be described as a full-court press, much of the financial elite of Oklahoma has...

Constitution Columnists

Richard Engle

Our Dirty Little (Not So) Secret
Did anyone actually think the Devil would go about with horns and a dark suit tempting people with...

John Michener

Conspiracy Can Aid or End Our Culture of Corruption
We all have that friend for whom everything is a conspiracy. Typically, this person will latch on to...

Rep. Jason Murphey

The Need to Transform the Legislative Process
It is the time of year when legislators file legislation for the next session. Every so often I feel...

© 2001 - 2009 The Oklahoma Constitution, all rights reserved.
Contact the Oklahoma Constitution by calling 405-366-1125 or emailing okconsti@aol.com
Content Management System (CMS) provided by WebTeks CMS.