Conservative Index Add
pagetitle

Saturday, July 20th, 2019Last Update: Tuesday, May 7th, 2019 11:03:32 AM

Why the Second Amendment Protects AR-15s

By: David Deming

For decades the Federal Judiciary has been trying to interpret the Second Amendment out of the Constitution. It is, as Sanford Levinson has termed it, an “embarrassment” to an elite class of legal scholars that finds firearms to be unusual and repulsive objects. Now the Fourth Circuit Court has declared that the semi-automatic AR-15 rifle is not covered by the Second Amendment, despite that fact that is the most common rifle sold in the US. This execrable decision is the latest outrage in a long series of disingenuous judicial contortions.

The courts have never come to terms with the fact that any intelligible reading of the Second Amendment requires an interpretation that acknowledges and reconciles its two clauses. The operative clause speaks of the “right of the people,” while the prefatory clause justifies the operative clause by professing that a “well regulated militia” is “necessary to the security of a free state.”

Prior to the Heller (2008) decision by the Supreme Court, for sixty years or more the federal judiciary almost unanimously ruled that the Second Amendment did not guarantee an individual right. The militia mentioned in the prefatory clause was taken to be the National Guard. Thus the right described in the operative clause was interpreted to be the right of States to maintain militia. This interpretation was never credible because it excised the Second Amendment from its contextual and historical underpinnings.

In the Heller (2008) decision, the Supreme Court stated unequivocally for the first time that the Second Amendment protects an individual right. But Heller (2008) was badly flawed. Reversing decades of precedent by lower courts, the Supreme Court read the prefatory militia clause out of the Second Amendment and interpreted the operative clause to protect a personal right. While finding that people have a right to keep a handgun at home for the purpose of self-defense, the Court noted in passing that “dangerous and unusual weapons” were not covered by the Second Amendment. But they failed to explain what these might be. The Heller Court went so far as to suggest that “weapons most useful in military service–M-16 rifles and the like–may be banned.” Although the Heller (2008) decision established an individual right, it also opened the door for lower courts to uphold any statute that banned “dangerous” weapons or those that might be useful “in military service.” The flaw is obvious when one recognizes that virtually all weapons are potentially dangerous and useful in military applications.

Thus we arrive at the Fourth Circuit decision that even though AR-15 rifles are commonplace, they may be banned because they are “like” M-16s and “useful in military service.” As the dissenting judges noted, this curious logic would have made it possible to ban the muskets and rifles used by citizen militia during the Revolutionary War. But why stop there? Handguns are standard-issue military weapons. Shotguns and bolt-action rifles have been employed by the US military. At one time or place, virtually every weapon has been used by the military, including knives and tomahawks. The irresistible conclusion is that the Second Amendment protects nothing.

The Second Amendment has never been recondite, it is only the judges who have been obtuse. An intelligible interpretation of the Second Amendment emerges the instant one reconciles the prefatory and operative clauses. In other words, the “militia” described in the prefatory clause is a militia composed of a people with a right to keep and bear arms. What type of arms? In 1939, the Supreme Court spoke explicitly to this. At the time the Second Amendment was adopted, men summoned to militia duty were expected “to appear bearing arms supplied by themselves and of the kind in common use at the time.” The Amendment not only protects weapons that might be useful in a military context, arguably it only protects those weapons useful in military service. Thus the Fourth Circuit Court was exactly and completely wrong.

What weapons are excluded? Those not in the common usage by an individual citizen, such as poison gas or large artillery pieces. The phrase used in Heller (2008), “dangerous and unusual,” is properly understood to refer to weapons of mass destruction. For those who worry that this interpretation would allow the sale and possession of machine guns, take note: there are currently about half-a-million registered and transferable fully-automatic weapons owned by individuals in the US. Yet these are virtually never misused.

Judge Gorsuch has recently reminded us that good judges often reach decisions they don’t like. Federal judges have found in our Constitution rights to both abortion and gay marriage, subjects that never appear. Perhaps they should consider extending the same latitude to an ancient right that is explicitly provided for.

About David Deming

David Deming is a geophysicist and professor of arts and sciences at the University of Oklahoma. His book, Black & White: Politically Incorrect Essays on Politics, Culture, Science, Religion, Energy and Environment, is available for purchase on Amazon.com

Other Articles By David Deming

Is the University of Oklahoma a Racist Institution?

The University of Oklahoma is apparently becoming infamous as a hotbed of racism. In 2015, a video...

A Tale of Two Professors

In the Fall 2018 issue of the Oklahoma Constitution, I related the persecution of OU law professor...

Conservative Christians Unwelcome at OU

The nation was transfixed by the smear campaign launched against judge Brett Kavanaugh. In a...

OU President Galloglys Challenge

When he assumed office on July 1, OU President James Gallogly found a full plate. But foremost among...

Should We Surrender on Bump Stocks?

In the aftermath of the October 1, 2017, mass shooting in Las Vegas, the US Justice Department has...

A Three-Point Plan for Reforming Higher Education in Oklahoma

Over the past few years the higher education establishment in Oklahoma has repeatedly warned that...

Why the Second Amendment Protects AR-15s

For decades the Federal Judiciary has been trying to interpret the Second Amendment out of the...

Other Constitution Columnists

Richard Engle

No More Mr. GOP
Many years ago when I was still young enough to be a Young Republican, I served as State Chair of...

John Michener

The Duty to Abolish Abortion: We are Without Excuse
The movement to abolish abortion has finally reached critical mass. Enough concerned and educated...

Tim Bakamjian

Stitts Strong Start
In his January 14th inaugural address, Governor Kevin Stitt outlined a clear set of goals for his...

Linda Murphy

The Expanding Role of K-12 Public Schools
The expanding role of social services and social change in K-12 schools should be closely examined....

Byron Schlomach

Oklahomas Dismal Public Education Ranking
Governor Stitt has made it his goal to move Oklahoma toward top ten status among the states. Exactly...

Bill Graves

The True Meaning of the Constitutions Cruel & Unusual Punishment Clause
1. The Framers Meaning of Cruel and Unusual PunishmentThe Constitutions Eighth Amendment provides...

Theodore King

The Federal Page for Spring 2019
National Debt Now Exceeds 22 TrillionOn February 12, the United States Treasury Department reported...

David Deming

Is the University of Oklahoma a Racist Institution?
The University of Oklahoma is apparently becoming infamous as a hotbed of racism. In 2015, a video...

Steve Byas

Conversion Therapy Bill is Totalitarian
When it comes to abortion, the relationship between the physician (i.e. the abortionist) and the...

In The News

Constitution Staff

Medicaid Initiative Petition Filed
A filing was made at the Oklahoma Secretary of State office on April 19 for proposed State Question...

Constitution Staff

State Election Board Conducts Voter List Maintenance
The State Election Board completed its statutorily-mandated, biennial voter list maintenance on...

Constitution Staff

Bills Make Their Way Through Oklahoma Legislature
With the close of the legislative session approaching at the end of May, various bills are being...

Constitution Staff

Gov. Stitt Establishes Cabinet
On January 24, Gov. Kevin Stitt issued his first executive order since becoming governor. The...

Constitution Staff

Oklahoma Republicans Elect Leaders and Adopt Platform
On April 6, nearly 1,000 delegates attended the Oklahoma Republican State Convention held at the...

Constitution Columnists

Richard Engle

No More Mr. GOP
Many years ago when I was still young enough to be a Young Republican, I served as State Chair of...

John Michener

The Duty to Abolish Abortion: We are Without Excuse
The movement to abolish abortion has finally reached critical mass. Enough concerned and educated...

Tim Bakamjian

Stitts Strong Start
In his January 14th inaugural address, Governor Kevin Stitt outlined a clear set of goals for his...

© 2001 - 2009 The Oklahoma Constitution, all rights reserved.
Contact the Oklahoma Constitution by calling 405-366-1125 or emailing okconsti@aol.com
Content Management System (CMS) provided by WebTeks CMS.